|
تقييم القدرة الفنية للشركات
الاخوة الافاضل يسعدنى أن ارفق لكم بعض الامثلة الهامة فى هذا الموضوع
CURRICULUM VITAE
Proposed role in the project:Team leader
1.Family name:
2.First name:
3.Date of birth
4.Nationality:
5.Civil status:
6.Education:
Degree(s) or Diploma(s) obtained: Institution
[Date from - Date to ]
7.Language skills: Indicate comeptence on a scale of 1 to 5 ( 1-Excellent )
Writing Speaking Reading Language
8.Membership of professional bodies:
9.Other skills: (e.g computer literacy, etc.)
Level of proficiency Program/System
10.Presen position:
1.New extension of homiat hospital 2.Beni Suef medical center 3.Suez medical center 4.Fayum medical center
11.Years within a firm:From till
12.Key qualifications: (relevent to the project)
Projects Description Position Company Location Date from - Date to
13.Specific experience in the region:
Date from - Date to Counrty
14.Professional experience
Description Position Company Location Date from-Date to
15.Other relevant informaion ( e.g Publications)
Maximum Initial assessment Revised assessment (before interviews*) Revised assessment after interviews*
Organisation and methodology
Rationale 20
Strategy 20
Timetable of activities 10
Total score for Organisation and methodology 50
Key experts
<Key expert 1> (Max 25 points)
Qualifications and skills 5
General professional experience 5
Specific professional experience 15
<Key expert 2> (Max 15 points)
Qualifications and skills 2
General professional experience 4
Specific professional experience 9
<Key expert 3> (Max 5 points)
Qualifications and skills 1
General professional experience 1
Specific professional experience 3
<Key expert 4> (Max 5 points)
Qualifications and skills 1
General professional experience 1
Specific professional experience 3
Total score for Key experts 50
Overall total score 100
* In the case that interviews are held
Strengths
Weaknesses
Evaluation performed by:
Name
Signature
Date
INSTRUCTIONS TO EVALUATORS
Each evaluator must make an initial assessment of the technical offers and award scores on each sub-criterion according to his/her assessment.
Each evaluator should be able to justify his/her assessment and scores in a meeting of the Evaluation Committee. The justifications must relate to the description of the project needs in the terms of reference and, for the key experts, to the profile descriptions included in it. Evaluators must therefore make comments in the strengths and weaknesses boxes.
The assessments made will be discussed in the evaluation meeting(s) and each evaluator may make adjustments to the initial assessments after this discussion.
If interviews are held, each evaluator may revise his/her assessment of individual key experts on the basis of these but the justification for any such adjustment must be given to the Evaluation Committee.
Note that only tenders with average scores of at least 80 points qualify for the financial evaluation.
4 STAFF RESOURCES
Please provide the following personnel statistics* for the current year and the two previous years.
Average manpower Year before last Last year This year
Overall Total for fields related to this contract e Overall Total for fields related to this contract e Overall Total for fields related to this contract e
Permanent staff f
Other staff g
Total
Permanent staff as a proportion of total staff (%) % %
* if this application is being submitted by a consortium, the data in the table above must be the sum of the data in the corresponding tables in the declarations provided by the consortium partners – see point 7 of this application form.
e corresponding to the relevant specialisms identified in point 5 below
f staff directly employed by the Candidate on a permanent basis (ie, under indefinite contracts)
g other staff not directly employed by the Candidate on a permanent basis (ie, under fixed-term contracts)
|